 |
 |
 |
MR. JUSTICE CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK concurring in a separate opinion.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS concurring in a separate opinion.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, whom MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER join, dissenting.
Agreeing fully with Part I of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN's dissenting opinion, I express no view as to the merits of the constitutional issue which the Court today decides. I would, however, reverse the judgment in this case, because I am persuaded that the provision of § 2905.34 of the Ohio Revised Code, upon which the petitioner's conviction was based, is, in the words of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, not "consistent with the rights of free thought and expression assured against state action by the Fourteenth Amendment."
|
|
|
© 1995 - 2009, Touro Law Center